April 19, 2025

3 thoughts on “How to wage cyber warfare: The relationship between cyber and kinetics, Part 7

  1. Sam,

    Although you state that a “kinetic capability is required,” your examples indicate kinetic effects. Is it really necessary to have kinetic effects to have cyberwar?

    For a COIN perspective, warafre is often thought of as population-centric rather than enemy-centric. This means that the bulk of the effort is design to influence that population and many of the effects generated are non-kinetic. As you know its the whole hearts and minds thing and often consists of humanitarian-type operations. If cyber effects are generated to engage in a battle for the hearts and minds, isn’t this a form of cyberwar? There Iran things comes to mind although it seems to be limited to the WWW component of cyberspace (although I think some cellphone stuff is also included). Both sides are using or blocking things like twitter in an effort to generate non-kinetic effects designed to influence the population.

    I’m trying to wrap my head around this. Am I way off here? -john

  2. You are not far off base. This particular article argues that kinetic is a part of the cyber warfare spectrum and discusses that portion of the spectrum in detail. Cyber warfare refers to a terrain just like land warfare is a terrain (or domain for the military parlance). Land war is filled with the features of massed formation, insurgency, guerilla warfare, and such. The same can be said about cyber warfare as applied to the terrain. I most definitely believe and am a strong proponent that like “space war” we will find cyber warfare has specific tactics and strategies that are specific to this domain. Similar to how we don’t find very many submersibles in land warfare. This article though is arguing that for cyber warfare to be an actual war fighting domain the kinetic effects must exist as part of that spectrum. This is also true about space as a terrain. As to that argument I try and show that the evidence exists that cyber space has kinetic impact.

    I also believe and am a strong proponent of the low intensity conflict model (hence COIN) is a valid and supporting conflict model that we can exploit through cyber space. The winning hearts and minds strikes at the information operations aspects of cyber warfare. However, I am in this piece acknowledging that cyber warfare is much more than that too. Cyber terrain includes as part of the battle space extensive tools and weapons that are much more than IO would include. In other words the IO aspects found in JP3-13 are inside the much larger aspect of cyber warfare itself.

  3. I first have to say, thanks for putting something like this together. Its an awesome resource. Good Stuff!!

    This is very interesting topic and the use of kinetic actions in cyber warfare is not new, but I have to agree with SAM, that 1) Cyber warfare is a part of a bigger picture (IO) and 2) You not only dont need to have kinetic actions to fight a cyber war, you want to stay away from them. A good part of cyber warfare is not destruction of equipment or data, but manipulation of that data to create a mindset. by destroying the physical layer, you prevent the ability to change the data. Dont get me wrong, there are times when you want to “go in with guns blazing”, but for the most part, you can create a kinetic effect without ever firing a shot.
    For instance, lets say a company want stealing corporate secrets from another company. 99% of companies would stop the leak instead of control the flow. By stopping the leak, they protect what they have left and move on. However, by controlling the flow, they can at a minimum destroy the reputation and reliability of the person stealing the information. By controling the flow, I mean they “allow” certain modified information be taken, painting a very good, but incorrect picture for the stealing company. This causes the stealing company to expend resources for little or no gain.
    I think the bottom line is that the information operations aspects should drive the level of network operations. Sometimes kinetic actions are needed, but not always.
    Thanks again. This is awesome!! Looking forward to reading more.

Comments are closed.